6 ms·

We should start by repealing the 2nd amendment. It is a bad law. Edit: This along with arm confiscation would limit force in police interactions and thus lower

We should start by repealing the 2nd amendment. It is a bad law. Edit: This along with arm confiscation would limit force in police interactions and thus lower aggression.

sumedh 6y ago
> We should start by repealing the 2nd amendment How should people protect their houses/shops when armed criminals try to rob your place?
- WesternStar 6y ago
  Call the police and have insurance.
  - defnotashton2 6y ago
    And what about when response rates are 40 minutes? What about the gov being oppressive? HK would be diff.
    - WesternStar 6y ago
      The United States of America has an oppressive government if they wanted to use their weapons to protect against tyranny today would be that day. But they don't the 70 million gun owners of America march in support of tyranny not against it.
  - sumedh 6y ago
    What should you do till the police don't come and who will help you out till you get the insurance payout which is not a guarantee.
    - WesternStar 6y ago
      Well I didn't say you couldn't fight. My proposal includes confiscation. Assume very aggressive pursuit of criminals with an unlicensed firearms. Like multi-county dragnet with blocked roads. Like we get O(100) cops for one gun. Most criminals will just probably keep it to cold arms.
      - sumedh 6y ago
        How exactly are you going to fight armed criminals with just your hands or a knife? Confiscation from lawful gun owners, why, what crime did they commit?
        WesternStar 6y ago
        People with guns lose fights too. Cold Arms are easier to assess and much easier to run from. Who said anything about a crime that's like asking in the current regime cocaine users what crime did they commit. I'm not suggesting arresting them. I want their weapons. They aren't using them to defend against tyranny so what good are they.
        sumedh 6y ago
        People can lose if they are armed or not armed so that is not valid argument for not taking up arms. > They aren't using them to defend against tyranny so what good are they. They are using it to protect their homes and stores from rioters so they are atleast doing something. Its very easy to say take away their weapons but you dont provide a realistic solution for defending life and property.
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]

We should start by repealing the 2nd amendment. It is a bad law. Edit: This along with arm confiscation would limit force in police interactions and thus lower aggression.

sumedh 6y ago

> We should start by repealing the 2nd amendment How should people protect their houses/shops when armed criminals try to rob your place?

WesternStar 6y ago
Call the police and have insurance.
- defnotashton2 6y ago
  And what about when response rates are 40 minutes? What about the gov being oppressive? HK would be diff.
  - WesternStar 6y ago
    The United States of America has an oppressive government if they wanted to use their weapons to protect against tyranny today would be that day. But they don't the 70 million gun owners of America march in support of tyranny not against it.
- sumedh 6y ago
  What should you do till the police don't come and who will help you out till you get the insurance payout which is not a guarantee.
  - WesternStar 6y ago
    Well I didn't say you couldn't fight. My proposal includes confiscation. Assume very aggressive pursuit of criminals with an unlicensed firearms. Like multi-county dragnet with blocked roads. Like we get O(100) cops for one gun. Most criminals will just probably keep it to cold arms.
    - sumedh 6y ago
      How exactly are you going to fight armed criminals with just your hands or a knife? Confiscation from lawful gun owners, why, what crime did they commit?
      - WesternStar 6y ago
        People with guns lose fights too. Cold Arms are easier to assess and much easier to run from. Who said anything about a crime that's like asking in the current regime cocaine users what crime did they commit. I'm not suggesting arresting them. I want their weapons. They aren't using them to defend against tyranny so what good are they.
        sumedh 6y ago
        People can lose if they are armed or not armed so that is not valid argument for not taking up arms. > They aren't using them to defend against tyranny so what good are they. They are using it to protect their homes and stores from rioters so they are atleast doing something. Its very easy to say take away their weapons but you dont provide a realistic solution for defending life and property.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]