5 ms·
Show HN: Serverless storage exposed via localStorage like API
- jackleslie 6y agoNice! I really like the design of the website as well, and the domain name. Is there a possibility of implementing Storage.clear or Storage.removeItem?
- krthr 6y agoLooks pretty cool. Any space or bandwidth restrictions?
- dutzi_ 6y agoNot right now, but if I find it becoming pricy I might ask users to verify their account by phone beyond a certain usage threshold, to prevent spammers from using it. If it keeps getting bigger I'll try other database solutions (MongoDB, DynamoDb, ...)
- dirtnugget 6y agoHow can you afford to pay for other people’s storage?
- rafisarshalom 6y agoAs this storage aims for serverless apps and it isn’t secure (anyone with access to your token can read/write to it) I assume usage won’t be too high. If that won’t be the case I’ll consider cheaper alternatives to Firebase. If it’s still stays an issue then I’ll look for sponsorship.
- dirtnugget 6y agoStill a very generous offer. Can you read all the data?
- RobLach 6y agofun
- qwtel 6y agoNitpick but could have adopted the kv-storage API instead: https://github.com/WICG/kv-storage https://github.com/WICG/kv-storage
- searchableguy 6y ago> Work on this specification is currently suspended, as no browser teams (including the Chromium project, which originated the proposal) are currently indicating interest in implementing it. I am not sure if that would be a good idea given above.
- dutzi_ 6y agoHm, I wasn't aware of it, I'll check it out