8 ms·
So no one has heard of RFC6648 ? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
by esjr 6y ago
So no one has heard of RFC6648 ?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
- wlll 6y ago> "…in practice the benefits [of the "X-" convention] have been outweighed by the costs associated with the leakage of unstandardized parameters into the standards space." Honestly, prefixing silly, fun or extra headers with X- like in this scenario seems pretty harmless.