5 ms·

Shelter-in-Place Compliance Remains Low, UMD Research Finds

11 points by catbird 6y ago

chmullig 6y ago
I haven’t fully explored their portal. However I find it really hard to square with other data, such as a 90% reduction in NYC subway data. https://iquantny.tumblr.com/post/616488508041936896/nyc-subway-ridership-starts-to-climb-as-cuomo https://iquantny.tumblr.com/post/616488508041936896/nyc-subw...
s1artibartfast 6y ago
Interesting website but terrible analysis. Nowhere do they define what high compliance means. Wyoming has the worst results in their social distancing despite the lowest population density in the US. (6/square mile) https://data.covid.umd.edu/findings/index.html https://data.covid.umd.edu/findings/index.html
- elcritch 6y ago
  Not to mention, one of the lowest rates of COVID-19 deaths per capita in the US. We literally can count on our fingers the number of COVID-19 casualties in the state. We've been really lucky in that, but it also shows that these shelter-in-place metrics here have almost not correlation (here) to effectiveness of preventing corona virus spread.
silverreads 6y ago
So of the people with smartphones, who also carry them with them everywhere, and allow location services, and somehow were added to the dataset of anonymized user location data, presumably by using crappy "free" services, compliance is low. Well golly gee. People that don't care seem to not care. Meanwhile I haven't seen my friends and family in two months and have a locked down mobile device that doesn't even have the google play store on it, for privacy.
- sjg007 6y ago
  I mean you are the exception here. I see teenagers hanging out and tons of people in parks and stores. Most are mask less. Now is the time to double down on social distancing.
3fe9a03ccd14ca5 6y ago
Yes, 100% compliance is low. We already knew people weren't going to be 100% compliant. I would say it's close to 80% for most people right now, which is pretty darn good considering what's being asked of us. Thankfully our outcome is still significantly better than what the models predicted, and that's a reason to celebrate.
pcdoodle 6y ago
Of course, people wake up to the reality of it. Everybody dies, life is short.

11 points by catbird 6y ago

I haven’t fully explored their portal. However I find it really hard to square with other data, such as a 90% reduction in NYC subway data. https://iquantny.tumblr.com/post/616488508041936896/nyc-subway-ridership-starts-to-climb-as-cuomo https://iquantny.tumblr.com/post/616488508041936896/nyc-subw...

s1artibartfast 6y ago

Interesting website but terrible analysis. Nowhere do they define what high compliance means. Wyoming has the worst results in their social distancing despite the lowest population density in the US. (6/square mile) https://data.covid.umd.edu/findings/index.html https://data.covid.umd.edu/findings/index.html

elcritch 6y ago
Not to mention, one of the lowest rates of COVID-19 deaths per capita in the US. We literally can count on our fingers the number of COVID-19 casualties in the state. We've been really lucky in that, but it also shows that these shelter-in-place metrics here have almost not correlation (here) to effectiveness of preventing corona virus spread.

silverreads 6y ago

So of the people with smartphones, who also carry them with them everywhere, and allow location services, and somehow were added to the dataset of anonymized user location data, presumably by using crappy "free" services, compliance is low. Well golly gee. People that don't care seem to not care. Meanwhile I haven't seen my friends and family in two months and have a locked down mobile device that doesn't even have the google play store on it, for privacy.

sjg007 6y ago
I mean you are the exception here. I see teenagers hanging out and tons of people in parks and stores. Most are mask less. Now is the time to double down on social distancing.

3fe9a03ccd14ca5 6y ago

Yes, 100% compliance is low. We already knew people weren't going to be 100% compliant. I would say it's close to 80% for most people right now, which is pretty darn good considering what's being asked of us. Thankfully our outcome is still significantly better than what the models predicted, and that's a reason to celebrate.

pcdoodle 6y ago

Of course, people wake up to the reality of it. Everybody dies, life is short.