> we shouldn’t just be ranking people by age, if we want to come to moral outcomes? Agreed. But I think quantifications can still be useful. Person-years prob

> we shouldn’t just be ranking people by age, if we want to come to moral outcomes? Agreed. But I think quantifications can still be useful. Person-years probably aren't the right sort of quantification though, in that they blend together too many kinds of human experience. But I imagine most people would agree that statements like "X% of grandparents, lost 10 years earlier than expected" or "Y% of children under 10" allow for comparing the relative impact on families. Quantifying losses doesn't mean that we consider the quantified as fungible.