12 ms·

I don't understand your 4th conclusion at all. He never once said he's excited, you are assuming quite a lot... People are allowed to analyze world events and

• smt88 6y ago
  > I don't understand your 4th conclusion at all. He never once said he's excited, you are assuming quite a lot... It was the combination of the unnecessary exclamation marks and the lack of speculation that people dying is bad. All of the speculation was about the people being bad for the economy, and how things may get better when they're gone. > This is like yelling at someone for analyzing the effect of WW2's aftermath on Europe. OK, let's run with your analogy. What if someone wrote the following: After WW2, will the tax burden of education young men suddenly go down!? Will we see better classroom ratios because so many young people have died!? Will hospitals have more space because the population is lower!? It's theoretically valid speculation, but it's also only representing the positive side of millions of deaths.