6 ms·
Here is the demo video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d96LZJJZ3dE&feature=emb_title https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d96LZJJZ3dE&feature=emb_titl...
by rlindskog 6y ago
Here is the demo video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d96LZJJZ3dE&feature=emb_title https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d96LZJJZ3dE&feature=emb_titl...
- kingbirdy 6y agoYou have to manually edit the display for every single instance of an item, rather than just being able to set it for all items of that type? That seems tedious and error-prone.
- rlindskog 6y agoThanks for the feedback, I get where you're coming from. I thought a lot about this. If you set it by type, then it wouldn't make sense either. Take pokemon() and pokemon() { evolutions } for example. For pokemon() you would expect a profile like component, and for evolutions you would expect a list item component, even though they are the same type (Pokemon). That being said, reusable components is on the roadmap, this is just the beginning.