5 ms·
Found it: http://kqueue.org/blog/2013/09/17/cltq/ http://kqueue.org/blog/2013/09/17/cltq/
by tropo 6y ago
Found it:
http://kqueue.org/blog/2013/09/17/cltq/ http://kqueue.org/blog/2013/09/17/cltq/
- flatfinger 6y agoSee post above. There is no good way for compilers to handle that case, but gcc gets "creative" even in cases where the authors of C89 made their intentions clear.