13 ms·
Surely anomaly detection is better done by a machine? I guess there's a certain level of human "intuition" about these things but is this not what most banks a
by Pt_ 6y ago
Surely anomaly detection is better done by a machine?
I guess there's a certain level of human "intuition" about these things but is this not what most banks anti-fraud systems do already?
- SQueeeeeL 6y agoI imagine the problem with this is it becomes a game-able system if it's purely automated. Sort of like the stereotype in Law and Order where they always pay hitmen $9,999 because "the IRS only monitors transfers over 10k."
- Pt_ 6y agoI think its game-able automated or not. Fraud exists today and is playing on these exact systems.
- kevinventullo 6y agoOn the other hand, maybe this is a kind of perverse benefit of opaque ML systems.
- loco5niner 6y ago> Surely anomaly detection is better done by a machine? I've worked with machines. I don't think this is a good idea.