5 ms·

Hey, my Open Source database is the #1 CRDT rated system on GitHub, and is used in-production by 10M+ people a month, at non-profits like the Internet Archive,

Hey, my Open Source database is the #1 CRDT rated system on GitHub, and is used in-production by 10M+ people a month, at non-profits like the Internet Archive, and others. https://github.com/topics/crdt https://github.com/topics/crdt Mind adding it to the site?

faitswulff 6y ago
There's an "edit this page" option on the top right of the page: https://crdt.tech/implementations https://crdt.tech/implementations
- marknadal 6y ago
  Thanks, was on mobile which doesn't show it. Edit: (reply is now showing)
  - marknadal 6y ago
    Not sure why my post was flagged. Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me. Proof: https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849
    - capableweb 6y ago
      As usual, you continue to mention GUN one way or another in every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization. Your comment would actually fit this submission but I guess at this point people are so tired of your spamming that they had enough, even when it's relevant. Edit: I just checked out the link you put as "proof" that he added GUN to the list himself, not you. Link: https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 Martin Kleppmann > To all interested in CRDTs: Marc Shapiro, @anne_biene and I have set up a little CRDT community website. Lots of links to papers, blog posts, talks, and implementations. Contributions welcome! You (Mark Nadal) > Saw this on HN. > Can I ask why mine was excluded? > I'm pretty sure you know about it. > It is rated #1 CRDT system on GitHub ( https://github.com/topics/crdt https://github.com/topics/crdt ) > It is used in production by HackerNoon, non-profits like Internet Archive, & other large sites. > Handling 10M+ monthly users. I'm not sure I or you misunderstand "Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me" but it seems pretty clear that you prompted him to add GUN to the list, he didn't discover GUN on his own and then added it. Mark, when you're gonna realize that this excessive spamming of GUN is not helping your case?
      - marknadal 6y ago
        I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me. But for every 1 hater there are 100s of hackers that have found, starred, used, or told me (in our chat channel) they were thankful they discovered GUN via HackerNews. & HN guidelines encourage on-topic submissions & comments (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) "Anything that good hackers would find interesting ... anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity" even you have to admit that GUN discussions have sparked a lot of intellectual & algorithm chats. Finally, you state I'm not spamming then say I am spamming. Spam is indiscriminate posting of something, yet your very own comment says "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization." That is indeed on-topic according to HN policy.
        capableweb 6y ago
        > I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me. The "hate" (I'd say critique) is not against GUN as a project nor the code or the project itself. It's about you constantly posting about GUN. > "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization." This is a bit unfair, that's not a direct quote of what I wrote, and I'm sure you know this. What I wrote is this: "every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization". The "slightly" part is important, because many of your comments mentioning GUN is on submissions not related to GUN at all. For example, if a submission is about Mastodon, I'm fairly certain I'll see a comment from you promoting GUN with your usual metrics. Again, I have nothing against GUN itself, but people do get tired, even if it's interesting the first time, when someone continues to mention their project over and over again. Others have mentioned this to you in the past as well (one example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21383815 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21383815) but it doesn't seem to stick. Maybe it's time for dang or other moderators to have a chat with you, if they haven't already. Because I'm bored, here is some examples of comments you've made promoting GUN on unrelated posts with low effort content in order to get in a link to GUNs website (in the last 3 months) [maybe this list will help you realize what people are getting tired off] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22498939 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22498939 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22448631 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22448631 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22439616 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22439616 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22233236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22233236 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21730879 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21730879
layoutIfNeeded 6y ago
oh hi mark

faitswulff 6y ago

There's an "edit this page" option on the top right of the page: https://crdt.tech/implementations https://crdt.tech/implementations

marknadal 6y ago
Thanks, was on mobile which doesn't show it. Edit: (reply is now showing)
- marknadal 6y ago
  Not sure why my post was flagged. Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me. Proof: https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849
  - capableweb 6y ago
    As usual, you continue to mention GUN one way or another in every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization. Your comment would actually fit this submission but I guess at this point people are so tired of your spamming that they had enough, even when it's relevant. Edit: I just checked out the link you put as "proof" that he added GUN to the list himself, not you. Link: https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849 Martin Kleppmann > To all interested in CRDTs: Marc Shapiro, @anne_biene and I have set up a little CRDT community website. Lots of links to papers, blog posts, talks, and implementations. Contributions welcome! You (Mark Nadal) > Saw this on HN. > Can I ask why mine was excluded? > I'm pretty sure you know about it. > It is rated #1 CRDT system on GitHub ( https://github.com/topics/crdt https://github.com/topics/crdt ) > It is used in production by HackerNoon, non-profits like Internet Archive, & other large sites. > Handling 10M+ monthly users. I'm not sure I or you misunderstand "Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me" but it seems pretty clear that you prompted him to add GUN to the list, he didn't discover GUN on his own and then added it. Mark, when you're gonna realize that this excessive spamming of GUN is not helping your case?
    - marknadal 6y ago
      I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me. But for every 1 hater there are 100s of hackers that have found, starred, used, or told me (in our chat channel) they were thankful they discovered GUN via HackerNews. & HN guidelines encourage on-topic submissions & comments (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) "Anything that good hackers would find interesting ... anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity" even you have to admit that GUN discussions have sparked a lot of intellectual & algorithm chats. Finally, you state I'm not spamming then say I am spamming. Spam is indiscriminate posting of something, yet your very own comment says "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization." That is indeed on-topic according to HN policy.
      - capableweb 6y ago
        > I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me. The "hate" (I'd say critique) is not against GUN as a project nor the code or the project itself. It's about you constantly posting about GUN. > "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization." This is a bit unfair, that's not a direct quote of what I wrote, and I'm sure you know this. What I wrote is this: "every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization". The "slightly" part is important, because many of your comments mentioning GUN is on submissions not related to GUN at all. For example, if a submission is about Mastodon, I'm fairly certain I'll see a comment from you promoting GUN with your usual metrics. Again, I have nothing against GUN itself, but people do get tired, even if it's interesting the first time, when someone continues to mention their project over and over again. Others have mentioned this to you in the past as well (one example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21383815 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21383815) but it doesn't seem to stick. Maybe it's time for dang or other moderators to have a chat with you, if they haven't already. Because I'm bored, here is some examples of comments you've made promoting GUN on unrelated posts with low effort content in order to get in a link to GUNs website (in the last 3 months) [maybe this list will help you realize what people are getting tired off] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22498939 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22498939 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22448631 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22448631 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22439616 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22439616 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22233236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22233236 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21730879 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21730879

layoutIfNeeded 6y ago

oh hi mark