5 ms·
>With the bailout were basically saying its OK to not pay taxes but expect a bailout suppose this were true and this legislation set that precedent? let me ask
by throwqwerty 6y ago
>With the bailout were basically saying its OK to not pay taxes but expect a bailout
suppose this were true and this legislation set that precedent?
let me ask you: how often do we have a need for a "bailout"? do a really quick cost/benefit analysis and you'll see that you're implying we should let these people struggle today to save some money in ~10 years. does that make sense to you?
- ProAm 6y agoThats absolutely not what Im saying, Im saying that these company execs that want the government to help their contractors are being so selfishly hypocritical. If they want to help their contractors, these billion dollar companies can offer things like health insurance, PTO/sick leave, etc... It's insane they are asking the government to help these contractors so they can continue to make money as a business as cheap as possible when things are back in order. Of course we should help these people. Everyone should help and paying taxes and providing benefits is the social agreement we've made in this country so we can help when issues like this arise.