7 ms·
more data is needed; the way that article is written is very casual and this is not a peer reviewed paper.
by romski 6y ago
more data is needed; the way that article is written is very casual and this is not a peer reviewed paper.
- svara 6y agoFair, but the author is about as well-respected an epidemiologist as you will find. The article is explaining what the default assumption should be. Empirical data might change that view.