5 ms·
When I studied medicine 15 years ago 130-139 mm Hg was not considered high blood pressure. We were young students and we were toying everyday measuring our bloo
by listsfrin 7y ago
When I studied medicine 15 years ago 130-139 mm Hg was not considered high blood pressure. We were young students and we were toying everyday measuring our blood pressure. Most males had over 130.
It seems times are changing: https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/facts.htm https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/facts.htm
We have "evolved"!
- runin2k1 7y agoYour initial proposal was that most of the Covid related deaths were due underlying conditions. Now you propose that the underlying condition most present isn't really a condition.
- listsfrin 7y agoYou made me curios about it so I did a quick internet search for what is considered high blood pressure in Italy. I found https://www.epicentro.iss.it/ben/2002/settembre02/2_en https://www.epicentro.iss.it/ben/2002/settembre02/2_en (the same health institute that provided the study I was talking about above). I quote: "The prevalence of borderline hypertension was calculated by determining the number of persons who had systolic pressures between 140 and 160 mm Hg or who had diastolic pressures between 90 and 95 mm Hg." This is more inline with what I've been thought in med school in my time.