4 ms·

>I'm not even sexist ... and yet in reply to a completely neutral comment proposing that the article might be relevant because one of the two people in it was

by vietor 16y ago

>I'm not even sexist ... and yet in reply to a completely neutral comment proposing that the article might be relevant because one of the two people in it was just featured in a very highly rated article last week, you create a one-off account and go on a full paragraph gender rant ... Edit: I agree with the top poster, I was expecting more in-depth analysis when I hit the link. But voting up a follow-up story to someone who was just highly featured in the community is not exactly an inexplicable response.

gender-bias 16y ago
nah, it's the first and probably last someone relevent context available where people will still have this fresh in their minds. The fact is you proved the point. Instead of addressing any points you called me a sexist and downvoted. In formal argument this is called ad hominem.