5 ms·

If you love hasura and want something like firebase, please check out the tutorial with hasura + RxDB. It is like having a firebase with better offline-first an

If you love hasura and want something like firebase, please check out the tutorial with hasura + RxDB. It is like having a firebase with better offline-first and more features and of course without vendor lock-in. https://hasura.io/blog/building-an-offline-first-web-app-with-rxdb-hasura/ https://hasura.io/blog/building-an-offline-first-web-app-wit...

elitan 7y ago
What I liked with Firebase was how easy and fast everything was. One-click create a new project and everything was ready to use. It's this developer experience I want to mimic with Nhost. By providing a managed backend with simple to use js-sdk (https://github.com/nhost/nhost-js-sdk https://github.com/nhost/nhost-js-sdk).
- lucasverra 7y ago
  I'm a web entrepreneur and for my project i've been using Parse server project (1) implementation by Back4app (2). For the non initiated, Parse server is a API server module for Node/Express + mongo + websocket and stuff you need to run a commercial app like auth, role management et all. We chose this because : 1.Open source (no vendor locking although now i'm sure if i had to move from b4a it would be a small PITA 2. Ready to use 3. actively maintained (graphQL have been implemented although we have not used it yet) (3) My question is : should i invest time on discovering nhost for my next POC ? (1) : https://github.com/parse-community https://github.com/parse-community (2) : https://www.back4app.com/ https://www.back4app.com/ (3) : https://docs.parseplatform.org/graphql/guide/ https://docs.parseplatform.org/graphql/guide/
  - elitan 7y ago
    Yes! The main advantages for me with the Hasura/Nhost stack is: 1. SQL (Thanks PostgreSQL) 2. Instant realtime GraphQL (Thanks Hasura) 3. Zero vendor lock-in
    - FAKEDETECTOR 7y ago
      > 3. Zero vendor lock-in This is wrong. For basic features that are absolutely needed for a real-life app you will need the "Pro" hasura license.
      - elitan 7y ago
        No you don't.
- SkyPuncher 7y ago
  I had the opposite experience with Firebase. Amazing at first, but quickly fell apart when I had to implement any sort of meaningful business logic.
  - elitan 7y ago
    Yes I agree with you. With Hasura there are 3 main ways to handle business logic. We use the first one at Nhost and it's working (and scale) very well. 1. https://3factor.app/ https://3factor.app/ 2. Actions - https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/manual/actions/index.html https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/manual/actions/index.html 3. Remote Schema - https://hasura.nhost.io/console/remote-schemas/manage/schemas https://hasura.nhost.io/console/remote-schemas/manage/schema... I know Hasura is actively working on this exact issue and they just released Actions (second option) and I think we will start to see a standard/best practice approach to business logic soon.
    - samblr 7y ago
      Having tried remote schemas and reading about actions - I should say it doesn't feel right. @elitan - just checking nhost. Features sounds promising. Did you use hasura for building nhost's backend as well ?
      - elitan 7y ago
        Yes Nhost is built on the same stack you get with a new Nhost project.

elitan 7y ago

What I liked with Firebase was how easy and fast everything was. One-click create a new project and everything was ready to use. It's this developer experience I want to mimic with Nhost. By providing a managed backend with simple to use js-sdk (https://github.com/nhost/nhost-js-sdk https://github.com/nhost/nhost-js-sdk).

lucasverra 7y ago
I'm a web entrepreneur and for my project i've been using Parse server project (1) implementation by Back4app (2). For the non initiated, Parse server is a API server module for Node/Express + mongo + websocket and stuff you need to run a commercial app like auth, role management et all. We chose this because : 1.Open source (no vendor locking although now i'm sure if i had to move from b4a it would be a small PITA 2. Ready to use 3. actively maintained (graphQL have been implemented although we have not used it yet) (3) My question is : should i invest time on discovering nhost for my next POC ? (1) : https://github.com/parse-community https://github.com/parse-community (2) : https://www.back4app.com/ https://www.back4app.com/ (3) : https://docs.parseplatform.org/graphql/guide/ https://docs.parseplatform.org/graphql/guide/
- elitan 7y ago
  Yes! The main advantages for me with the Hasura/Nhost stack is: 1. SQL (Thanks PostgreSQL) 2. Instant realtime GraphQL (Thanks Hasura) 3. Zero vendor lock-in
  - FAKEDETECTOR 7y ago
    > 3. Zero vendor lock-in This is wrong. For basic features that are absolutely needed for a real-life app you will need the "Pro" hasura license.
    - elitan 7y ago
      No you don't.
SkyPuncher 7y ago
I had the opposite experience with Firebase. Amazing at first, but quickly fell apart when I had to implement any sort of meaningful business logic.
- elitan 7y ago
  Yes I agree with you. With Hasura there are 3 main ways to handle business logic. We use the first one at Nhost and it's working (and scale) very well. 1. https://3factor.app/ https://3factor.app/ 2. Actions - https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/manual/actions/index.html https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/manual/actions/index.html 3. Remote Schema - https://hasura.nhost.io/console/remote-schemas/manage/schemas https://hasura.nhost.io/console/remote-schemas/manage/schema... I know Hasura is actively working on this exact issue and they just released Actions (second option) and I think we will start to see a standard/best practice approach to business logic soon.
  - samblr 7y ago
    Having tried remote schemas and reading about actions - I should say it doesn't feel right. @elitan - just checking nhost. Features sounds promising. Did you use hasura for building nhost's backend as well ?
    - elitan 7y ago
      Yes Nhost is built on the same stack you get with a new Nhost project.