7 ms·
Do you have reference to that Google study? I'd really like to read it.
by vilts 7y ago
Do you have reference to that Google study? I'd really like to read it.
- dnissley 7y agohttps://www.blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/ensuring-we-pay-fairly-and-equitably/ https://www.blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/...
- e12e 7y agoThanks, if that's what was referenced above, it certainly isn't a study to see if women were underpaid - but to see if anyone was underpaid. And reading the brief content: > There are a couple of reasons that the pay equity analysis required more adjustments in 2018, compared to 2017. First, the 2018 analysis flagged one particularly large job code (Level 4 Software Engineer) for adjustments. Within this job code, men were flagged for adjustments because they received less discretionary funds than women. Secondly, this year we undertook a new hire analysis to look for any discrepancies in offers to new employees—this accounted for 49 percent of the total dollars spent on adjustments. I suppose a natural question would be if an overpaid se4 is an underpromoted se5, or if an underpaid se4 is an overpromoted sr3. I understand the try to correct for "similar roles" - but that doesn't mean the promtion/roles are accurate. Either way; interesting link.