6 ms·
on a sample of 9 random images from the repository: all nine looked like random point and click photos - soft focus, poor lighting, no composition - as if, in
by codeduck 7y ago
on a sample of 9 random images from the repository:
all nine looked like random point and click photos - soft focus, poor lighting, no composition - as if, in fact, you'd faced a landscape feature and taken a photo with no thought to how to present it.
I'm not going to click through all the images, but based on the sample I took it doesn't deserve the 'beautiful' adjective.
- grantcarthew 7y agoI'm no photographer @codeduck. I like them as wallpaper though. I haven't added many from the "Wiki Loves Earth" competition yet. They might be better from your perspective.
- StavrosK 7y agoI both agree and disagree. Most of these look straight out of the camera (unprocessed) but I didn't find them as bad as you say, they were mostly good SooC photos that just hadn't been processed. I didn't find many with soft focus.