6 ms·
I'm 99% sure this isn't true. Can you point to a single paper that mentions it? Edit: actually I'm 100% sure this isn't true. See for example the all sky map f
by astro123 7y ago
I'm 99% sure this isn't true. Can you point to a single paper that mentions it?
Edit: actually I'm 100% sure this isn't true. See for example the all sky map from planck (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2013/newsspec_5106/img/planck_976.jpg http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2013/newsspec_5106/img/pla...). And a paper discussing how they will measure the CMB dipole using planck https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A%26A...393..359P/abstract https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A%26A...393..359P/abst...
- tyfon 7y agoI stand corrected, the current Planck analysis seems to take in account that we are moving through the CMB rest frame although I need to read a bit more. It's a long paper [1] It was the earlier Planck measurements that did not account for this. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12875.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12875.pdf
- mturmon 7y agoThis effect seems to be treated and dismissed as insignificant w/r/t the cosmological parameters, in section 3.11 (page 78) of the paper you reference. There were a lot of new systematic effects in the Planck data, and a lot of the data analysis work amounted to identifying the most significant ones and modeling them out.