> If preserving wildlife and forests can be equated with preserving suburban lifestyles and property values It can't, and shouldn't, be equated to that. Denser

> If preserving wildlife and forests can be equated with preserving suburban lifestyles and property values It can't, and shouldn't, be equated to that. Denser urban living, i.e. building more housing in cities, reduces suburban sprawl. That's a good thing if you care about the environment.