8 ms·
It's kind of the point, in two ways. First, the constant usage of the Bible to justify political discourse is both a staple of the USA and also painfully stupid
by FisDugthop 7y ago
It's kind of the point, in two ways. First, the constant usage of the Bible to justify political discourse is both a staple of the USA and also painfully stupid. It doesn't matter how nice of an imaginary picture is painted by the "city upon a hill"; it's still a religious and rose-tinted portrait. Exodus probably didn't happen, and so it is a nice story (like Harry Potter) but not worth bringing to the policy table.
Second, the Bible is just not very well-translated. Consider this instead:
> You are the salt of the earth.
> Your flavor brings merit and mirth.
> But use too much extra, anybody could tell ya
> Oversalted food has no worth.
> You are the light of the world.
> Like a town on a hill, you are pearled.
> But in light we bask, only while it's unmask'd
> So fly your town's flags high and unfurled.
Still terrible, but at least now it rhymes correctly.
- oh_sigh 7y agoWith KJV at least, the a goal was to create a work that was dignified and resonated with the public. Doggerel rhymes don't really fit that scheme. Please don't take that as an insult - I actually like your version, but it lacks dignity.
- giancarlostoro 7y agoIt wasn't intending to rhyme though.