7 ms·

I am not religious whatsoever, but I do like this passage from the book of Ecclesiastes in the Old Testament: I have seen something else under the sun: The

I am not religious whatsoever, but I do like this passage from the book of Ecclesiastes in the Old Testament: I have seen something else under the sun: The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all.

ekianjo 7y ago
Yes but no at the same time. It is much more likely to become wealthy if you are brilliant than not (assuming the starting point is the same) and that is precisely why acquiring skills increases your odds of success, and while on an individual level luck plays a big role on aggregate we can see that trends emerge very clearly.
- marnett 7y ago
  I heard somewhere, don’t remember where, but the easiest route to wealth, I heard, was simply to be born with it.
  - dahfizz 7y ago
    I mean, how could that possibly not be true? The easiest way to obtain an apple is to have one materialize in your hand.
  - sandoooo 7y ago
    What exactly is a body suppose to do with this revelatory revelation? Wallow, maybe? Is wallowing being suggested here? Maybe with a side of anger at the unjustness of it all? If only somebody would pay me a living wage for my great wallowing ability...
    - speedplane 7y ago
      > What exactly is a body suppose to do with this revelatory revelation? Wallow, maybe? Is wallowing being suggested here? Maybe with a side of anger at the unjustness of it all? There's plenty that can be done to equalize advantages based on inherited wealth. A wealth tax would be simple, an estate tax is another. I don't think anyone would agree that "wallowing" would help.
      - sandoooo 7y ago
        Notice that it is basically impossible to extract a significant amount of additional wealth from the 0.1%. It is both well-defended (politically and legally) and tied up in complicated structures that are difficult to liquidate by force. Notice also that the middle class have no such protections. I'm assuming by wealth tax you mean some sort of magical system where Zuckerberg is forced to pay off your student loans. However what will actually happen is the wholesale liquidation of the middle class to fill the twin bottomless pits of medicare and social security, while the billionares skip the country and/or hide behind arcane tax rules, and the Valley they leave behind gets turned into a jobs program for the homeless. The other fundamental problem with giving a big additional slice of the national wealth to the poor is that they will spend it on consumer services (not goods, which are cheap), for which they have great pent-up demand. And then it'll be gone. At which point you no longer have a middle class to extract from.
        speedplane 7y ago
        > it is basically impossible to extract a significant amount of additional wealth from the 0.1%. I'm not sure I buy this. If the IRS can measure income, they can also measure wealth. Sure rich folks will try to hide wealth, but they've also tried to hide income and the IRS when well funded is decently competent at finding it. > The other fundamental problem with giving a big additional slice of the national wealth to the poor is that they will spend it on consumer services That's no what anyone is advocating. They are advocating basic healthcare and education, not exactly consumer services. > At which point you no longer have a middle class to extract from. Even super leftist democrats are not advocating taxing the middle class. They are focusing on the super rich. The somewhat nice thing about this type of taxation is that even though it'll effect the absolute money you have, it won't affect your wealth rank. Sure, maybe Bezos' or Gates' net worth will go down, but they will still be the richest in the US. Your low-millionaire friends may be slightly less rich, but they will still be just as rich rank-wise as they were before. Folks generally get less upset about taxes if it keeps their existing rank and standing in society
        sandoooo 7y ago
- UserIsUnused 7y ago
  >increases your odds of success, Exactly. Odds. Both Fortune and misfortune can happen in the middle. This doesn't mean to stop practicing/learning/improving, it's just life. Be aware of these things, and look for opportunities. Also, remenber that because of this, some very skillful person might be underperforming just because of a bad day, be nice to them.
fenomas 7y ago
Famously commented on by Damon Runyan: > The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.
- DarkWiiPlayer 7y ago
  But dressing up obvious statistical anomalies in fancy wording does seem to convince the careless reader that that it is indeed some very deep and meaningful thought. Too many wisdoms come down to this simple formula, but without ever drawing any real conclusion, or adding any real phylosophical value to what is, to the scientific mind a no-brainer.
  - 99052882514569 7y ago
    You're being a little hard on the Bible.
  - Psyladine 7y ago
    I bet you were always angry the hare didn't win when he is clearly much faster than the turtle.
    - dang 7y ago
      Could you please stop posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments to HN? You've been doing it a lot, and we ban accounts that do that. We have to, because we're trying for something different here—curious conversation—which those things either choke out or destroy. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
      - Psyladine 7y ago
        Denigrating aphorisms that have survived both millenia & civilizations 'obvious statistical anomalies in fancy wording' is to my eyes as baiting a comment as you could write...maybe I am out of tone with this community then. HN would do far better to ban viral spreading behaviors than to ban the fever, as snark is reactively to smarm. http://gawker.com/on-smarm-1476594977 http://gawker.com/on-smarm-1476594977
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
christiansakai 7y ago
LOL. I literally just gave a talk last night to a group of church friends about being a tech worker, going to bootcamp vs cs degree, work in startups vs FAANG, and long term career as a tech worker. I put this verse in the end of the talk.
- downerending 7y ago
  Could add "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.", and on and on. I won't quote at length, but after decades in tech, I feel like much of this book speaks directly to us.
toxik 7y ago
Just a friendly reminder that verbatim blocks are not well-suited for block quoting.
- downerending 7y ago
  Er, are there any alternatives on HN?
  - DoreenMichele 7y ago
    Most people italicize quotes here.

ekianjo 7y ago

Yes but no at the same time. It is much more likely to become wealthy if you are brilliant than not (assuming the starting point is the same) and that is precisely why acquiring skills increases your odds of success, and while on an individual level luck plays a big role on aggregate we can see that trends emerge very clearly.

marnett 7y ago
I heard somewhere, don’t remember where, but the easiest route to wealth, I heard, was simply to be born with it.
- dahfizz 7y ago
  I mean, how could that possibly not be true? The easiest way to obtain an apple is to have one materialize in your hand.
- sandoooo 7y ago
  What exactly is a body suppose to do with this revelatory revelation? Wallow, maybe? Is wallowing being suggested here? Maybe with a side of anger at the unjustness of it all? If only somebody would pay me a living wage for my great wallowing ability...
  - speedplane 7y ago
    > What exactly is a body suppose to do with this revelatory revelation? Wallow, maybe? Is wallowing being suggested here? Maybe with a side of anger at the unjustness of it all? There's plenty that can be done to equalize advantages based on inherited wealth. A wealth tax would be simple, an estate tax is another. I don't think anyone would agree that "wallowing" would help.
    - sandoooo 7y ago
      Notice that it is basically impossible to extract a significant amount of additional wealth from the 0.1%. It is both well-defended (politically and legally) and tied up in complicated structures that are difficult to liquidate by force. Notice also that the middle class have no such protections. I'm assuming by wealth tax you mean some sort of magical system where Zuckerberg is forced to pay off your student loans. However what will actually happen is the wholesale liquidation of the middle class to fill the twin bottomless pits of medicare and social security, while the billionares skip the country and/or hide behind arcane tax rules, and the Valley they leave behind gets turned into a jobs program for the homeless. The other fundamental problem with giving a big additional slice of the national wealth to the poor is that they will spend it on consumer services (not goods, which are cheap), for which they have great pent-up demand. And then it'll be gone. At which point you no longer have a middle class to extract from.
      - speedplane 7y ago
        > it is basically impossible to extract a significant amount of additional wealth from the 0.1%. I'm not sure I buy this. If the IRS can measure income, they can also measure wealth. Sure rich folks will try to hide wealth, but they've also tried to hide income and the IRS when well funded is decently competent at finding it. > The other fundamental problem with giving a big additional slice of the national wealth to the poor is that they will spend it on consumer services That's no what anyone is advocating. They are advocating basic healthcare and education, not exactly consumer services. > At which point you no longer have a middle class to extract from. Even super leftist democrats are not advocating taxing the middle class. They are focusing on the super rich. The somewhat nice thing about this type of taxation is that even though it'll effect the absolute money you have, it won't affect your wealth rank. Sure, maybe Bezos' or Gates' net worth will go down, but they will still be the richest in the US. Your low-millionaire friends may be slightly less rich, but they will still be just as rich rank-wise as they were before. Folks generally get less upset about taxes if it keeps their existing rank and standing in society
        sandoooo 7y ago
UserIsUnused 7y ago
>increases your odds of success, Exactly. Odds. Both Fortune and misfortune can happen in the middle. This doesn't mean to stop practicing/learning/improving, it's just life. Be aware of these things, and look for opportunities. Also, remenber that because of this, some very skillful person might be underperforming just because of a bad day, be nice to them.

fenomas 7y ago

Famously commented on by Damon Runyan: > The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.

DarkWiiPlayer 7y ago
But dressing up obvious statistical anomalies in fancy wording does seem to convince the careless reader that that it is indeed some very deep and meaningful thought. Too many wisdoms come down to this simple formula, but without ever drawing any real conclusion, or adding any real phylosophical value to what is, to the scientific mind a no-brainer.
- 99052882514569 7y ago
  You're being a little hard on the Bible.
- Psyladine 7y ago
  I bet you were always angry the hare didn't win when he is clearly much faster than the turtle.
  - dang 7y ago
    Could you please stop posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments to HN? You've been doing it a lot, and we ban accounts that do that. We have to, because we're trying for something different here—curious conversation—which those things either choke out or destroy. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
    - Psyladine 7y ago
      Denigrating aphorisms that have survived both millenia & civilizations 'obvious statistical anomalies in fancy wording' is to my eyes as baiting a comment as you could write...maybe I am out of tone with this community then. HN would do far better to ban viral spreading behaviors than to ban the fever, as snark is reactively to smarm. http://gawker.com/on-smarm-1476594977 http://gawker.com/on-smarm-1476594977

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

christiansakai 7y ago

LOL. I literally just gave a talk last night to a group of church friends about being a tech worker, going to bootcamp vs cs degree, work in startups vs FAANG, and long term career as a tech worker. I put this verse in the end of the talk.

downerending 7y ago
Could add "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.", and on and on. I won't quote at length, but after decades in tech, I feel like much of this book speaks directly to us.

toxik 7y ago

Just a friendly reminder that verbatim blocks are not well-suited for block quoting.

downerending 7y ago
Er, are there any alternatives on HN?
- DoreenMichele 7y ago
  Most people italicize quotes here.