6 ms·
I see this as analogous to saying > Numbers are inherently binary. You could call 93 "a decimal number", but I would just call it "a number". There's no point
by Double_Cast 7y ago
I see this as analogous to saying
> Numbers are inherently binary. You could call 93 "a decimal number", but I would just call it "a number". There's no point in having the term "decimal" since the tech stack is all just "(binary) numbers" beneath layers of indirection.
Surely you see the usefulness in assigning each layer of indirection a unique qualifier?