6 ms·

Well, if this is a disagreement over the word "monopoly" I'll just cite wikipedia: Patents, copyrights, and trademarks are sometimes used as examples of govern

by ta0987 7y ago

Well, if this is a disagreement over the word "monopoly" I'll just cite wikipedia: Patents, copyrights, and trademarks are sometimes used as examples of government-granted monopolies. Third paragraph from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly So, yes, HBO does have a monopoly on Game of Thrones, and my email provider does have a monopoly on my email address. This is, for example, why they explicitly passed a phone number portability law, because phone companies were abusing their monopoly power over individual phone numbers, to keep people from switching to different providers.

shadowgovt 7y ago
Do you anticipate passage of an email or domain name monopoly law? Could such a thing be passed (i.e. what government would enforce it)?
- ta0987 7y ago
  No? I'm not sure what the relevance of that is though? I mean, it would certainly be right for the government to limit the increase in the cost of .org registrations to inflation, or better to cap the profit margin, since costs are likely to decrease, but just because it's right, doesn't mean it'll happen. .org domains are an artificial scarcity that wasn't even created by a corporation. At least the telephone was invented privately, so you could argue phone numbers are fair game, but with domain names even that argument doesn't hold. There's no reason a private company should be extracting economic-rent from it.
  - shadowgovt 7y ago
    Only if one thinks .org has value over .anything-else. If one isn't hung up on having a .org at the end of their URL, there is a world of alternatives.
    - ta0987 7y ago
      .org does have value over .anything-else because .org domains already exist. The value is, for starters: branding, people remember sites. The value is also vendor-lock in. What you called "annoying" above. The value is not having to do that annoying thing, that is value, and it's what the registrar can now use to extract money from existing .org domains. The value is also, that if you let your .org domain lapse, since you don't want to pay for it, now someone else can take it and pretend to be you.

by ta0987 7y ago

shadowgovt 7y ago

Do you anticipate passage of an email or domain name monopoly law? Could such a thing be passed (i.e. what government would enforce it)?

ta0987 7y ago
No? I'm not sure what the relevance of that is though? I mean, it would certainly be right for the government to limit the increase in the cost of .org registrations to inflation, or better to cap the profit margin, since costs are likely to decrease, but just because it's right, doesn't mean it'll happen. .org domains are an artificial scarcity that wasn't even created by a corporation. At least the telephone was invented privately, so you could argue phone numbers are fair game, but with domain names even that argument doesn't hold. There's no reason a private company should be extracting economic-rent from it.
- shadowgovt 7y ago
  Only if one thinks .org has value over .anything-else. If one isn't hung up on having a .org at the end of their URL, there is a world of alternatives.
  - ta0987 7y ago
    .org does have value over .anything-else because .org domains already exist. The value is, for starters: branding, people remember sites. The value is also vendor-lock in. What you called "annoying" above. The value is not having to do that annoying thing, that is value, and it's what the registrar can now use to extract money from existing .org domains. The value is also, that if you let your .org domain lapse, since you don't want to pay for it, now someone else can take it and pretend to be you.