5 ms·
> you can use that truck and do a lot of work with it without having to worry about the paint or breaking something No. The flat shiny surfaces are more expen
by otabdeveloper2 7y ago
> you can use that truck and do a lot of work with it without having to worry about the paint or breaking something
No. The flat shiny surfaces are more expensive, harder to manufacture, more brittle and more susceptible to denting/scratching than a normal curved car surface.
That thing is a nightmare to take care of. Best keep in the garage unless someone breathes on it and ruins the look.
- NamTaf 7y agoFor those downvoting, this comment does have a nugget of truth: it holds if the materials are equivalent. Curved surfaces are a lot stiffer and deform less easily than flat surfaces because they have some out-of-plane depth to their overall shape. If you formed curved sheets out of this steel, it'd be tougher again than it is with flat surfaces.
- rcMgD2BwE72F 7y ago>No. The flat shiny surfaces are more expensive, harder to manufacture, more brittle and more susceptible to denting/scratching than a normal curved car surface. Where do you get that? How do you explain that the design team chose these flat surfaces in steel precisely for their lower cost, solidity and ease of manufacturing (source: https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-cybertruck-electric-pickup-engineering-manufacturing https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-cybertruck-electric-pi...)
- otabdeveloper2 7y ago> Where do you get that? An easy analogy to explain why curved surfaces are stronger: imagine an egg that is a cube instead of a spheroid. You see how an eggshell cube would be vastly more brittle than an egg, right? > chose these flat surfaces in steel precisely for their lower cost, solidity and ease of manufacturing To make an equivalently robust structure out of straight edges you need the steel to be much, much thicker. So yes on 'solidity', but no to the other two claims.
- rcMgD2BwE72F 7y agoDid you just ignore the entire article I linked in the comment you're replying to?