I did edit to elaborate where I thought there was ambiguity. Yes, I agree, if ASCAP, ICE_CS laid claim to the GP's work, then that needs to be fixed. I would s

I did edit to elaborate where I thought there was ambiguity. Yes, I agree, if ASCAP, ICE_CS laid claim to the GP's work, then that needs to be fixed. I would suggest any money paid to ASCAP, ICE_CS for that video be returned to the GP, with interest paid by ASCAP, ICE_CS and perhaps some punitive damages so they don't make the same "mistake" again. To be fair, or give the benefit of the doubt, this could be a Hanlon's Razor scenario where ASCAP, ICE_CS just doesn't understand how to do it right. Or they could be too heavy handed in which case the punitive damages should soften their hand.