4 ms·
Yeah, but the testimony was surely recorded already some years ago? Or did they just wait.. I doubt so.
by Shihan 7y ago
Yeah, but the testimony was surely recorded already some years ago? Or did they just wait.. I doubt so.
- ceejayoz 7y agoIf admissible, there'd still be the opportunity for cross examination. Any competent defense attorney should be able to easily impeach ten year old testimony by eliciting a whole bunch of "I don't remember" responses.
- walterstucco666 7y agoSweden is not U.S.
- vertex-four 7y agoSure, except that the victims would be called to the stand and get to answer everything they're asked with "I don't really remember", which isn't amazingly convincing.
- ptaipale 7y agoThe defence can still challenge the reliability of the testimony based on the time passed.
- SiempreViernes 7y agoAssange for one haven't been properly questioned, and he could well make relevant claims that are not covered in the old testimonies.