8 ms·
Ask HN: Is it safe to update to macOS Catalina (10.15.3)?
When Catalina first came out, HN was flooded with articles about how bad it was. Now, a few weeks later, is it safe to update my mac? I've backed up everything, but would still hate to have my personal laptop performing on a subpar level when I need it for photoshop, iterm2, xcode, firefox, etc.
- hnspirit 7y agoIt's fine and not noticeable.
- actionowl 7y agoIt depends on what all you use, at least GPGTools Mail plugin and MacOS FUSE (At least SSHFS) still don't support Catalina.
- slipwalker 7y agoi am running the Catalina 10.15.1 both on a Macbook pro retina 13 inch early 2015 and an iMac Retina 4K 21.5 inch 2017. For java/kotlin/angular/node/typescript/flutter development and system admin tasks. Both run a lot better than Mojave ever did.
- thijsvandien 7y agoIn what way? I only just upgraded to Mojave from Sierra, and consider it now usable enough, even though there are still obvious, stupid bugs. I would be surprised if Catalina had fewer of those already.
- slipwalker 7y agoMojave security "enhancements" kept the imac's I/O ( even with a SSD ) crawling, with the beachball hanging even on the most trivial I/O operations.
- Znafon 7y agoWe just got bite by a bug were Catalina would randomly delete some Wireguard tunnels. A temporary workaround to restore them has been published in the Wireguard client but Catalina doesn't feel stable at the moment.
- chatmasta 7y agoCurious if anyone is running it on a mid 2013 air?
- jvvlimme 7y agoYep, runs just fine. Except for some security settings I haven't noticed much difference with the older versions.
- tez12 7y agomy recommendation is to wait until it will become stable, if you dont need any particular new behave.
- frou_dh 7y ago10.15.2 is not even released yet, never mind 10.15.3
- gshdg 7y agoAvoid it if you use Mail.app. Otherwise doesn’t seem too bad. Performance isn’t an issue.
- copperfitting 7y agoI would rather prefer windows