5 ms·
Safari has only weak protections, basically url-level blocking equivalent to Pihole. Last I checked ublock origin does allow blocking elements by DOM selector.
by SomeOtherThrow 7y ago
Safari has only weak protections, basically url-level blocking equivalent to Pihole. Last I checked ublock origin does allow blocking elements by DOM selector.
One day ads will start being plexed with content over websockets and the DOM-level protections will be all we have. Firefox is really the only alternative here.
- mgleason_3 7y agoYup I really wish uBlock origin was available for Safari 13...
- saagarjha 7y ago> Safari has only weak protections, basically url-level blocking equivalent to Pihole. Last I checked ublock origin does allow blocking elements by DOM selector. No, Safari content blockers can target selectors as well.
- roar-of-time 7y agoYup, the only problem is the limit on the number of filters, which many people think is way too small.
- SomeOtherThrow 7y agoOh wow, my bad. Still, I’m not a fan—I don’t trust apple to be a good judge of behavior here.