4 ms·
It's compliant with FSF's definition of free software (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and Debian's guide
by hakl 16y ago
It's compliant with FSF's definition of free software (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and Debian's guidelines (http://www.debian.org/social_contract http://www.debian.org/social_contract).
Stallman himself agreed that it was a good thing for Xiph to relicense their libraries from the LGPL to a permissive free software license (http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast-dev/2001-February/000005.html http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast-dev/2001-February/00...):
In response to the change of license, Richard Stallman of the Free Software
Foundation says, "I agree. It is wise to make some of the Ogg Vorbis code
available for use in proprietary software, so that commercial companies doing
proprietary software will use it, and help Vorbis succeed in competition with
other formats that would be restricted against our use."
- spiffworks 16y agoWell, we're talking about two things, really- the webm reference implementation and the license under which the patents covering the spec are licensed. I guess the reference implementation is free as in freedom, and the spec is free as in beer to re-implement. This is why 'free standard' is such a pithy and accurate description.