6 ms·
That could be an even more efficient version of our test. As long as it screens for what you're looking for, I would definitely agree that shorter is better. I
by lbatx 7y ago
That could be an even more efficient version of our test. As long as it screens for what you're looking for, I would definitely agree that shorter is better.
It feels like it tests something different than writing code, though both may be a proxy for "quality candidate".