43 ms·
> The patch however sneakily removes the chance ... If they haven't tested on other processors, should they leave code in because it has a "chance" to work on
by luser1024 7y ago
> The patch however sneakily removes the chance ...
If they haven't tested on other processors, should they leave code in because it has a "chance" to work on something else? I think both sides of this question could be legitimately argued so I wouldn't jump to calling it "evil".
- Dylan16807 7y agoWhat do you mean `"chance" to work`? If the CPU claims to support an instruction, it's perfectly fine to treat it as supporting the instruction.