5 ms·
FOSS may have downsides, for instance it's free, but doesn't have iTunes built in. I consider both of these advantages, but some users don't. I consider the be
by HNcantBtrustd 7y ago
FOSS may have downsides, for instance it's free, but doesn't have iTunes built in.
I consider both of these advantages, but some users don't. I consider the benefits of open source far exceeds the perceived benefits of Apple's Ecosystem.
Maybe as developers it's important to teach our Apple Peers the problems they perpetuate by paying for walled gardens.
- oarsinsync 7y agoWhat about your apple peer developers, who have made a deliberate and conscious choice to use Apple devices in their day to day life, and stable open source solutions in production / deployment environments? Some of us used to live in the FOSS garden, and decided to trade extra money in exchange for receiving a lot of time back and a shiny finish. Everyones values vary.
- HNcantBtrustd 7y agoI don't think your premise that you are saving time is correct. Apple advertises similar to Luxury car buyers to make you believe you are getting a high quality product. But it's going to be really hard to prove things are quicker.
- chipotle_coyote 7y agoI know you didn't explicitly say "you only use Apple products because you've been suckered in by advertising," but it's hard not to take it as the subtext, and it's something that's long rubbed me the wrong way.
- opless 7y agoI think the apple experience is friction-less for their target market. Live in their ecosystem, and everything 'just works'. Watch, Phone, Tablet, Laptop. Linux/Windows you don't quite have that level of integration ... You expect more from luxury items than with a $300 windows/linux laptop, a $100 fitbit, or a $200 android tablet - good luck with getting a similar level of interoperability between them...
- JetSpiegel 7y agoTo be pedantic, the integration outside of Apple's ecosystem is available for the cognoscenti. Not for the masses.