6 ms·

Rather than the google solution suggested by a sibling comment, I’d suggest a look at send.firefox.com.

ahmedfromtunis 7y ago
They don't offer the same solution; Google's works on a peer to peer manner, no internet needed. Firefox's is more like Wetransfer.
badumtss 7y ago
I just wish they'd hurry up and make the android app useable. I signed up for the beta and was pretty disappointed as my uploads were cancelled if my screen locked or, horribly enough, rotated ...
- lostgame 7y ago
  I never understood coders who don't separate UI threads and network calls - which is exactly what it sounds like is happening, here.
- _underfl0w_ 7y ago
  Willing to bet their devs came from iOS. That would explain the android-specific quirks.
- lucb1e 7y ago
  Android is Linux, you can always just install it the normal way and use it from a terminal. Maybe that's what you mean by unusable (a terminal isn't very user-friendly, but it solves the file transfer / app availability problem). If I remember correctly, you can configure (I don't know what the default is) to power save or even turn off WiFi on Android when you turn off the screen. Are you sure that's not interfering with this beta app?
skrowl 7y ago
Send.firefox.com sends files over the internet, not peer-to-peer. If you're somewhere with poor (or no) network connectivity you can still use Google Files or AirDrop (I believe, not 100% sure on AirDrop).
- TheCraiggers 7y ago
  And if it was purely peer-to-peer people would complain that it doesn't work in their particular use case. Personally, it's rather nice sometimes to 'fire and forget' a file transfer with a tool like this. All I need to worry about is if I successfully uploaded the file. I don't need to worry about their internet connection, keeping some daemon running on my side, keeping power on my side, remembering to delete that file that I only kept around so somebody could download it from my computer, etc. The point is, options are good. Most of us subscribe to the Unix philosophy of "Write programs that do one thing and do it well" so why are so many advocating for a pancea solution that does everything for every use case?
- ncheek 7y ago
  That is correct, AirDrop works without Internet. It's unfortunate that Google and Apple have created these respective systems with no cross-compatibility. There's really no technological reason for it, but an obvious business reason.
- OrangeMango 7y ago
  I used AirDrop on an airplane at cruising altitude over the ocean, with no onboard wifi available. It worked just as perfectly as it did at home. The pilot had taken a video of the Falcon 9 second stage separating from the first on its first launch that docked with the ISS. He then walked through the cabin sharing with anyone that was interested.
  - vxNsr 7y ago
    That's awesome!
Fnoord 7y ago
Or magic-wormhole [1]. FOSS, x-platform, Python. [1] https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole

They don't offer the same solution; Google's works on a peer to peer manner, no internet needed. Firefox's is more like Wetransfer.

badumtss 7y ago

I just wish they'd hurry up and make the android app useable. I signed up for the beta and was pretty disappointed as my uploads were cancelled if my screen locked or, horribly enough, rotated ...

lostgame 7y ago
I never understood coders who don't separate UI threads and network calls - which is exactly what it sounds like is happening, here.
_underfl0w_ 7y ago
Willing to bet their devs came from iOS. That would explain the android-specific quirks.
lucb1e 7y ago
Android is Linux, you can always just install it the normal way and use it from a terminal. Maybe that's what you mean by unusable (a terminal isn't very user-friendly, but it solves the file transfer / app availability problem). If I remember correctly, you can configure (I don't know what the default is) to power save or even turn off WiFi on Android when you turn off the screen. Are you sure that's not interfering with this beta app?

skrowl 7y ago

Send.firefox.com sends files over the internet, not peer-to-peer. If you're somewhere with poor (or no) network connectivity you can still use Google Files or AirDrop (I believe, not 100% sure on AirDrop).

TheCraiggers 7y ago
And if it was purely peer-to-peer people would complain that it doesn't work in their particular use case. Personally, it's rather nice sometimes to 'fire and forget' a file transfer with a tool like this. All I need to worry about is if I successfully uploaded the file. I don't need to worry about their internet connection, keeping some daemon running on my side, keeping power on my side, remembering to delete that file that I only kept around so somebody could download it from my computer, etc. The point is, options are good. Most of us subscribe to the Unix philosophy of "Write programs that do one thing and do it well" so why are so many advocating for a pancea solution that does everything for every use case?
ncheek 7y ago
That is correct, AirDrop works without Internet. It's unfortunate that Google and Apple have created these respective systems with no cross-compatibility. There's really no technological reason for it, but an obvious business reason.
OrangeMango 7y ago
I used AirDrop on an airplane at cruising altitude over the ocean, with no onboard wifi available. It worked just as perfectly as it did at home. The pilot had taken a video of the Falcon 9 second stage separating from the first on its first launch that docked with the ISS. He then walked through the cabin sharing with anyone that was interested.
- vxNsr 7y ago
  That's awesome!

Fnoord 7y ago

Or magic-wormhole [1]. FOSS, x-platform, Python. [1] https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole