You focused on the wrong thing. It's not about exhaling carbon, or as you originally stated, "producing" CO2. It's about the absorption of Oxygen. Consider a p

You focused on the wrong thing. It's not about exhaling carbon, or as you originally stated, "producing" CO2. It's about the absorption of Oxygen. Consider a popular idea, that planting 1 trillion trees to scrub carbon through transpiration, I assume you're familiar with it, is given real credence as a solition to heterogenic climate change then why are you so quick to dismiss the notion that humans doing the exact same thing by breathing isn't an aspect of the problem of increasing CO2 PPM? My argument, was if the article is all about human population booms ending and thus with it Capitalism, and the author still only correlates economic activity to increasing climate danger then its irresponsible and uninformed. Undermining the entire premise of the article.