6 ms·
I am not saying that. I'm saying that considering the government to act only violently is a gross mischaracterization of reality such that even if you define th
by Retra 7y ago
I am not saying that. I'm saying that considering the government to act only violently is a gross mischaracterization of reality such that even if you define things such that it is technically true, it is not a useful position to take.
My government has never forced me to do anything with a threat of violence -- I have been threatened with different manners of obvious inconvenience, but if that is no more acceptable to you than an actual threat of violence, then I'm afraid that is an unproductive, reductive, and uncompromising opinion.
- geggam 7y agoIf you commit a victimless crime (speeding) and the agent of the state fears for his life while talking to you... you are dead. How is that not violent ?
- turk73 7y agoSo taxes are purely voluntary in your country? Must be nice! EVERYTHING, absolutely EVERYTHING a government "asks" of you comes with the implicit threat of violence for those who do not comply. There is only one tool in the box.