5 ms·
> Still much better than C++ though. Well, no. There is zero reason to use Rust if you already know modern C++. Rust's only benefit is being newbie-friendly.
by otabdeveloper2 7y ago
> Still much better than C++ though.
Well, no. There is zero reason to use Rust if you already know modern C++. Rust's only benefit is being newbie-friendly.
- rurban 7y agoI like cargo and easier threading. The syntax is annoying though. C/C++ really would benefit immensely from a central library repo.
- rat87 7y agoRust * is a lot simpler * has a package manager * has type classes (like interfaces with default implementations) * doesn't have multiple inheritance or inheritance * much nicer unified error/exception pattern * amazing compiler error messages * makes memory corruption and many forms of concurrency errors impossible(outside of ffi and unsafe) * has tuples+sum types w/destructing