I am totally against generics, if you want generics, go to Python, or somewhere else that allows them. The beauty in Go is that it is static, and generics are n

I am totally against generics, if you want generics, go to Python, or somewhere else that allows them. The beauty in Go is that it is static, and generics are not strict. I agree with wybiral [1]. This only serves to add complexity that gains very little, and opens Go to being less strict and there for less reliable and more problematic at compile time . [1] (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20555477 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20555477) edit: changed "strict" to "static"