4 ms·
I would rather have an Emacs that offers fewer choices but looks good out of the box. Example: the software supplied by Apple with a Mac does not have any them
by sielskr 16y ago
I would rather have an Emacs that offers fewer choices but looks good out of the box.
Example: the software supplied by Apple with a Mac does not have any themes except for the choice between Blue (colorful) and Graphite (subdued) in the Appearance system preference pane.
OTOH, I regularly have to wait for the software supplied by Apple and I almost never wait for Emacs.
- jpr 16y agoBy waiting, do you mean wait for the release, or wait because the software is busy doing something?
- sielskr 16y agoWait because the software is busy. E.g. OS X's spinning beach ball. (Emacs is single-threaded, but so is a Unix shell.)
- jamesbritt 16y ago"Example: the software supplied by Apple with a Mac does not have any themes except for the choice between Blue (colorful) and Graphite (subdued) in the Appearance system preference pane." Both of which I find strikingly unattractive. Overall, I find the OSX UI annoying to use, and the relatively lack of choices in things doesn't help. I like the idea of a useful out-of-the-box set of defaults, but that should prevent offering users options to tweak to their hearts' content.