7 ms·
> the author prefers dubious advantages to real improved security Encrypting the data transfer doesn’t improve any of the HTML email security issues. So I fail
by bjpbakker 7y ago
> the author prefers dubious advantages to real improved security
Encrypting the data transfer doesn’t improve any of the HTML email security issues. So I fail to see how that would be “real improved security”.
But I do share the authors sentiment on the failure to not using open standards of both Protonmail and Tutanota. So maybe I’m biased.
- knd775 7y agoThe data in a protonmail account is encrypted with your own key. How is protonmail supposed to encrypt an email if they receive it unencrypted over SMTP?
- bjpbakker 7y agoThere are various ways. One would be to use standard imap and decrypt the message on the client. Their bridge sort of does that but with proprietary protocol. Either way, that has absolutely nothing to do with the security issues of html email. Eg phishing and tracking still works when you decrypt the message and open it.