7 ms·
His biases are interesting but what really matters is the data. Either his empirical findings are correct or they are incorrect.
by alexryan 7y ago
His biases are interesting but what really matters is the data. Either his empirical findings are correct or they are incorrect.
- tptacek 7y agoCaveat lector. His empirical findings include the claim that because Google knows its users trend liberal (simple demographics would tell you that, without any intrusive analytics), it is unfair of Google to run universal "go vote" PSAs on its site, because doing so will favor the Democrats. Here's an article he wrote on The Epoch Times, which I believe is cited in the section about how Google is running GOTV for the Democrats: https://www.theepochtimes.com/another-way-google-manipulates-votes-without-us-knowing-a-go-vote-reminder-is-not-what-you-think-it-is_2754073.html https://www.theepochtimes.com/another-way-google-manipulates...
- drtillberg 7y agoAmen. When the first counter-argument is an assassination of the author's character-- we have a problem! The statements in the PDF are in the public interest. Debate them, don't simply make an ad homenim attack against the speaker.
- UncleMeat 7y agoAnd when Epstein loses the debate and continues to just make up wild accusations? Debate only functions if it ends.