6 ms·

Socialism at the time was inherently international.

• deogeo 7y ago
  That's not the same as against borders - see e.g. international trade, or tourism. Socialism today seems to agree with borders ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0 ), and back then, there was national socialism...
• pvg 7y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_One_Country https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_One_Country
  • Der_Einzige 7y ago
    Einstein was explicitly anti stalinist and advocates globalism in his work "Why Socialism" You can read it online
    • pvg 7y ago
      I don't understand how this is related to my comment and the comment I'm replying to, both of which you presumably just read online.
    • clydethefrog 7y ago
      Link to the piece: https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/ https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
• ptaipale 7y ago
  For there to be something meaningfully international, there have to be several nations, with something distinguishing between them.
  • opportune 7y ago
    Ok then call it global, it's not a meaningful distinction just a dumb nitpick