45 ms·
Ask HN: GitHub or Gitlab
Migrating from an existing Git provider, curious what other folks have to say.
We're a building a SaaS app with no open source components at the moment.
- stockkid 7y agoI have been enjoying Gitlab's built-in continuous integration service. If your app does not already use something else for continuous integration, it might be worthwhile to try out.
- davchana 7y ago@GitLab Way too cool than GH, no need for separate special branch for html publishing, free private repos.
- makison 7y agoGithub offers free private repos as well
- quickthrower2 7y agoBitbucket has been offering that for years
- mikanbu 7y agoGitLab is great but I believe it depends on the need of the project, here are a few examples of the things that might an issue On GitLab CE, you don't have the possibility to see the history of edited comments. Indeed, if you need to manage a community or even to simply have full traceability, this is an important feature that is missing. Furthermore, the ability to approve an MR is something that I miss using GitLab.
- stfs 7y agoGitLab has the ability to require merge requests
- mikanbu 7y agoThe ability to require, not to approve if I'm not mistaken.
- dsumenkovic 7y agoThanks for the feedback. I wanted to share the following issues [1] & [2] with you and everyone else since the features you've mentioned are already being discussed. Feel free to leave your thoughts in there: 1 - A proposal to move MR Approvals to CE https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/42096 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/42096 2 - Full history of edited comments https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/3706 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/3706
- slew1 7y agohttps://gitee.com https://gitee.com
- romanovcode 7y agoEverything is copied from GitHub down to the icons. Also, badly copied.
- mothsonasloth 7y agoGitlab all the way, as others have mentioned the CI pipeline is easy to setup. Another feature which is great is the Docker registry at the repository level.
- stfs 7y agoWe currently use Bitbucket (do not recommend) and we're evaluating GitLab. First impression is that it's a great package. The only downside for us is that we have a lot of legacy baggage, mostly rather opinionated build tools set up the way we liked it. Getting that to work with GitLab, which itself has a very opinionated view of the CI/CD pipeline is a bit of effort. But for a greenfield project I would go with GitLab in a second! GitLab is a "batteries included" kind of tool. They've put together a lot of excellent stuff and integrated different tools very well together. For example, we need to perform security scans on our code and artifacts and GitLab offers that with minimal effort and awesome integrations into your pull request (which they call merge requests) mechanism. Some may not like their approach, especially if they already have something that doesn't quite fit. But if you're starting from scratch, you really should give them a chance. They really know what they're doing ;-)
- dsumenkovic 7y agoGitLab Community Advocate here. Thanks for the feedback, I am happy to hear that you like our product. Since you are still evaulating GitLab, please let me know if you need any assistance or help regarding other features.
- stfs 7y agoThanks. Your support department has been quite active in responding to the issues I've had. But thanks for reaching out :)