7 ms·
My experience is the exact opposite. I often skim the article and find that commenters are better informed than the author and provide more relevant informatio
by vpmpaul 7y ago
My experience is the exact opposite. I often skim the article and find that commenters are better informed than the author and provide more relevant information.
- eeeuo 7y agoUnlike news companies, commentators do not gain monetary value from sensationalism. Authors of articles are generally more informed than their pieces suggest, but their editors step in and make the story "pop" for readers in order to generate clicks. This often involves removing nuance. I believe that most major news organizations make an honest effort to be factual, but there's a lot of room within the facts to be misleading. A commentator that is an expert in the field is not constrained by an editor, and can in a few paragraphs give a more realistic and accurate assessment of the phenomenon. When I read articles about things in which I'm not knowledgeable, I don't trust the conclusions until I see high quality comments(or tweets) that confirm the thesis of the article.
- bradstewart 7y agoHow do you know the commenters are better informed?
- baud147258 7y agoOne website where the comments are usually more interesting than the article is the register, which is mostly IT/high-tech-related news. But when I say more interesting, it's usually because they provide more context, another angle, more information or some humor.