> its probably worked because he actually facts of the case in his favor I think that's the point. He makes it pretty clear that he considers the chances of th

> its probably worked because he actually facts of the case in his favor I think that's the point. He makes it pretty clear that he considers the chances of this actually reaching court as close to enough to zero. > not because of these shenanigans. The 'shenanigans' obviously saves at least a short consult and by refusing to dignify the claim with a proper legal response (and doing so confidently) he may be saving an extended and costly engagement. Of course if the claim actually does go to court you've disadvantaged yourself considerably.