You're correct. They included a link to the actual paper: https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/492/eaav1102 https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/492/eaav1102

You're correct. They included a link to the actual paper: https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/492/eaav1102 https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/492/eaav1102 According to the paper, they achieved 85% sensitivity and 82% specificity (N=98)