7 ms·
"no failures noted" != "no failures".
by v_lisivka 7y ago
"no failures noted" != "no failures".
- fit2rule 7y ago.. unless of course the standard application for the device is in safety-critical/life-protection systems, in which case "no failures noted" better be honest.
- theamk 7y agoWhy? They try to keep all information secret, especially the one that make USSR looks bad. For example, they denied existence of Level 6 nuclear accident for 30 years [0]. If the nuclear accident which had 10,000 people evacuated was suppressed and denied for 30 years, why would you trust them to publish any negative information about military computer? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayak#Kyshtym_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayak#Kyshtym_disaster
- fit2rule 7y agoI mean, these systems are flying on the ISS and protecting American lives. If its good enough for NASA, its good enough for me. Or are you suggesting that NASA also fell for the scam?