6 ms·

I don't think it was an issue of misuse of tax payer dollars or anything like that. The point of allowing astronauts to bring personal items was to help keep t

I don't think it was an issue of misuse of tax payer dollars or anything like that. The point of allowing astronauts to bring personal items was to help keep their mental health stable and morale high over the course of an 8+ day journey in a very confined space under extreme stress. Having crew members thinking about how their side hustle was going to pan out when they got home would be a distraction and not in line with the goal of the personal item allocation. Additionally, if it was left unchecked then future astronauts would have had to choose between bringing a picture of their loved ones or passing up on a financial bonus which would have led to a bad situation. I can see why NASA cracked down on it pretty aggressively.

warent 7y ago
You've reached your one-post-per-year quota already and I think it's been well spent. This seems to be a perfect rationale when you put it in these terms
- plibither8 7y ago
  > You've reached your one-post-per-year quota already I've tried to make sense out of your comment but have failed. What do you exactly mean by this sentence?
  - Patient0 7y ago
    Suspect he was referring to the frequency of the parent poster's comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=chazzyluc https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=chazzyluc
    - plibither8 7y ago
      Ah yes, that makes sense now. Thank you.
  - deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]