5 ms·
> she'd lose the vote of pretty much every blue collar worker that aspires to have a stable job somewhere like Boeing It sounds like you're suggesting that we
by everdev 7y ago
> she'd lose the vote of pretty much every blue collar worker that aspires to have a stable job somewhere like Boeing
It sounds like you're suggesting that we shouldn't hold Boeing too accountable because they wouldn't be able to retain or hire as many blue collar workers.
That definitely could be a side effect but I'd be more concerned about creating safe airplanes than safe jobs.
- lotsofpulp 7y agodsfyu404ed never commented or implied on what should happen. He simply stated what might happen, and why it might happen.
- everdev 7y agoRight... Let's not be too hard on the tobacco companies because you'll lose the vote of every blue collar farmer that's wants a stable job cultivating tobacco. It's a pretty routine argument that says if you threaten my job for any reason I'll vote you out. Doesn't matter if my job is creating things that crash, giving people cancer, etc. That argument doesn't fly for a lot of us. There will still be mechanical and aerospace jobs, just at companies that aren't going to play fast and loose with regulations.
- RankingMember 7y agoI don't think he's saying that, but he is being a pessimist (though with the way our political system is working, maybe more a realist than I want to accept).