6 ms·

Java failed as a portable language-agnostic VM for user-facing apps. You know, the use-case it was originally designed for. (I read the hype for Java 1.0, I wa

Java failed as a portable language-agnostic VM for user-facing apps. You know, the use-case it was originally designed for. (I read the hype for Java 1.0, I was there.) Nobody at the time could imagine that Java would eventually become the enterprise COBOL replacement.

cmiles74 7y ago
I'm not so sure it failed. I use IntelliJ IDEA daily, people in my office use WebStorm for Javascript development. There are Swing applications out there that people use, admittedly the ones I've seen are mostly business software. And of course all Android applications are leveraging Java. It's argued that only IDEs use Java, but Java + Swing strikes me as the most popular cross-platform language and toolkit currently in use.
- vraivroo 7y ago
  that's only if you don't consider "web/browser" to be "cross-platform"
pjmlp 7y ago
We develop on Windows, deploy across OS X, Windows, UNIX, mainframes and embedded devices, without re-compiling. Looks pretty much living the dream of portable language-agnostic VM for user-facing apps to me.