> What is the trade-off for not being included by default in the main extension, CPU? gorhill's (developer of uBO) explanation from[1] below: > uBO-Extra is n

> What is the trade-off for not being included by default in the main extension, CPU? gorhill's (developer of uBO) explanation from[1] below: > uBO-Extra is needed to deal with IL stuff because the IL inline script appears at the top of the served HTML page -- before any other secondary resource-pulling tag. uBO-Extra injects its content script declaratively, i.e. on every page, hence it will always run before IL stuff. The root cause of why it is needed is because of a bug with web socket implementation in chrome.[2] Additional info on why both are needed (& why for chrome but not firefox) in some reddit threads.[3][4][5] [1] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/227#issuecomment-325188758 https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/227#issuecomm... [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=487422 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=487422 [3] https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/83quub/ublock_origin_extra_for_firefox/ https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/83quub/ublock... [4] https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/7mfkv1/ublock_origin_together_with_ublock_origin_extra/ https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/7mfkv1/ublock... [5] https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/a9trz2/ublock_origin_ublock_origin_extra_get_both_for/ https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/a9trz2/ublock_origi...